The documentary “Released” follows the stories of two incarcerated men, Kevin Sawyer and William Brown, as they navigate the parole board system in California. The film delves into the complex and often controversial debate surrounding the guiding principle of criminal justice – should it be focused on retribution or rehabilitation?
Kevin Sawyer and William Brown both have different backgrounds and experiences, but they are united by their desire for a second chance and the opportunity to reenter society as productive members. Sawyer, a former drug addict and gang member, has spent over 20 years in prison for armed robbery. Brown, on the other hand, was convicted of murder and has been incarcerated for nearly 40 years. Both men have undergone significant personal growth and transformation during their time in prison, participating in therapy programs, earning degrees, and mentoring other inmates.
The documentary sheds light on the challenges and complexities of the parole board system, which often focuses on punitive measures rather than rehabilitation. The parole board members must weigh a variety of factors when considering whether to grant parole, including the severity of the crime, the inmate’s behavior while incarcerated, and their plans for reintegration into society. This raises the fundamental question: what is the primary goal of the criminal justice system – punishment or rehabilitation?
Retribution, or the idea of “an eye for an eye,” has long been a guiding principle in the criminal justice system. Many argue that those who commit crimes must face consequences for their actions, and that punishment serves as a deterrent to others. However, others believe that the focus on retribution often leads to harsh sentences and a lack of focus on addressing the root causes of criminal behavior.
On the other hand, rehabilitation focuses on the idea of helping individuals change their behavior and reintegrate into society successfully. This approach emphasizes providing inmates with the resources and support they need to address the underlying issues that led to their criminal behavior, such as addiction, mental health issues, or lack of education. Proponents of rehabilitation argue that this approach not only benefits the individual but also society as a whole by reducing recidivism rates and promoting public safety.
Through the stories of Kevin Sawyer and William Brown, “Released” highlights the potential for transformation and redemption, even in the most challenging of circumstances. Both men have taken responsibility for their actions, expressed remorse, and demonstrated a commitment to making positive changes in their lives. They have worked tirelessly to improve themselves and to prove that they are capable of reentering society as contributing members.
The documentary also raises important questions about the role of race, socioeconomic status, and systemic inequalities in the criminal justice system. Studies have shown that people of color are disproportionately represented in the prison population, and that individuals from low-income backgrounds are more likely to be sentenced to harsher punishments. This raises concerns about the fairness and impartiality of the criminal justice system and the need for reforms to address these disparities.
Overall, “Released” challenges viewers to consider the guiding principles of the criminal justice system and to reflect on the values and priorities that should guide our approach to crime and punishment. By humanizing the experiences of Kevin Sawyer and William Brown, the film invites us to empathize with their struggles and to recognize the potential for growth and redemption in all individuals. Ultimately, it asks us to consider whether our focus should be on retribution or rehabilitation in our quest for justice.